Explore Web Browsers
- 2,613
- 8
- Item Reviews
- Customize
- All Rankings
Top 10 Best Web Browsers
Welcome to the Web Browser Piki, the best place to decide between web browsers. A web browser is your gateway to fast, efficient, and fun Internet browsing. Choose a web browser with the best features, speed, and security that matches your OS to best suit your needs. This Piki makes use of more than 2,600 facts about 37 web browsers. Sort and filter these web browsers according to your preferences using the options on the left. Whether you're looking for web browsers for downloading pornography, web browsers for privacy or something else entirely, we have you covered.
You are currently viewing the best web browsers. We stack everything according to PikiRank, which measures each item's performance for all users combined. If you're looking for a good bet, pick an item near the top.
Select Criteria
Reset Preferences
Recent Activity on Web Browsers
-
alaina
edited the Web Browser Piki
03/21 at 11:17 AM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 5 stars to Epiphany for infrequent crashes and glitches
03/19 at 8:06 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 5 stars to Epiphany for ease of navigation rating
03/19 at 8:06 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 4 stars to Epiphany for quality of support rating
03/19 at 8:06 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
created a review
03/19 at 8:06 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 4 stars to Epiphany for quality of support rating
03/19 at 8:05 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
created a review
03/19 at 8:05 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 5 stars to Epiphany for ease of navigation rating
03/19 at 8:05 PM (EDT)
-
nstevens
gave 5 stars to Epiphany for infrequent crashes and glitches
03/19 at 8:05 PM (EDT)
Independent, Unbiased, Fact-Based Rankings
Selected Preferences Overall: Best
Google Chrome
Google Chrome has a DOM/CSS loading time of 1,200 seconds, a JavaScript loading time of 1,700 seconds and a boot-up and warm loading time of 0.50 seconds. It has a cold loading time of 4.50 seconds and uses 200,000 kilobytes of memory without extensions and 340,000 kilobytes of memory with extensions.
- Developer: Google
-
Performance: DOM/CSS Loading Time - 1,200 seconds, JavaScript Loading Time - 1,700 seconds, Boot-up and Warm Loading Time - 0.50 seconds
Google Chrome achieves 94% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Ease of Navigation Rating - 5 stars, Access Keys, Page Zooming, Pop-up Blocking
Google Chrome achieves 0% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Opera
Opera has a DOM/CSS loading time of 1,500 seconds, a JavaScript loading time of 1,200 seconds and a boot-up and warm loading time of 0.75 seconds. It has a cold loading time of 2.75 seconds, uses 210,000 kilobytes of memory without extensions and loads tabs in 8.25 seconds.
- Developer: Opera Software
-
Performance: DOM/CSS Loading Time - 1,500 seconds, JavaScript Loading Time - 1,200 seconds, Boot-up and Warm Loading Time - 0.75 seconds
Opera achieves 100% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Ease of Navigation Rating - 5 stars,
Opera achieves 0% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Internet Explorer
Internet Explorer has a boot-up and warm loading time of 0.75 seconds and a cold loading time of 6 seconds and uses 250,000 kilobytes of memory without extensions. It loads tabs in 4.75 seconds, and Internet Explorer has frames and SMIL.
- Developer: Microsoft,
-
Performance: Boot-up and Warm Loading Time - 0.75 seconds
Internet Explorer achieves 7% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Access Keys, Ad Filtering, Caret Navigation
Internet Explorer achieves 72% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox has a DOM/CSS loading time of 700 seconds, a JavaScript loading time of 100 seconds and a boot-up and warm loading time of 0.75 seconds. It has a cold loading time of 4.25 seconds and uses 110,000 kilobytes of memory without extensions and 150,000 kilobytes of memory with extensions.
- Developer: Mozilla Foundation
-
Performance: DOM/CSS Loading Time - 700 seconds, JavaScript Loading Time - 100 seconds, Boot-up and Warm Loading Time - 0.75 seconds
Mozilla Firefox achieves 0% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Access Keys, Caret Navigation, Page Zooming
Mozilla Firefox achieves 88% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Safari
Safari has a DOM/CSS loading time of 1,200 seconds, a JavaScript loading time of 200 seconds and a boot-up and warm loading time of 5 seconds. It has a cold loading time of 8.25 seconds and uses 150,000 kilobytes of memory without extensions. Safari has CSS2.1.
- Developer: Apple Inc.
-
Performance: DOM/CSS Loading Time - 1,200 seconds, JavaScript Loading Time - 200 seconds, Boot-up and Warm Loading Time - 5 seconds
Safari achieves 78% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness
Safari achieves 0% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Maxthon
Maxthon has a DOM/CSS loading time of 1,000 seconds, and it has frames, SMIL and VML. It has XSLT, and it receives good marks for ease of navigation from Pikimal users.
- Developer: Maxthon International Limited
-
Performance: DOM/CSS Loading Time - 1,000 seconds
Maxthon achieves 18% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Ease of Navigation Rating - 4 stars, Access Keys, Ad Filtering, Caret Navigation
Maxthon achieves 0% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
OmniWeb
OmniWeb has CSS2.1, frames and XHTML 1.0, it has XHTML 1.1, and it has access keys and ad filtering.
- Developer: The Omni Group
-
Performance
OmniWeb achieves 34% performance for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Access Keys, Ad Filtering, Page Zooming
OmniWeb achieves 94% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
DocZilla
DocZilla has frames, mathML and navlinks, and it has XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1 and XSLT.
- Developer: CiTEC
-
Performance
We currently have no data on DocZilla for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Tabbed Browsing
DocZilla achieves 24% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
Mozilla
Mozilla has CSS2.1, frames and mathML, and it has navlinks, XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1.
- Developer: Mozilla Foundation
-
Performance
We currently have no data on Mozilla for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Access Keys, Ad Filtering, Caret Navigation
Mozilla achieves 100% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.
ELinks
ELinks has frames, and it has access keys, caret navigation and spatial navigation. It has tabbed browsing, and it has bookmark managing.
- Developer: Baudis, Fonseca, et al.
-
Performance
We currently have no data on ELinks for performance.
-
User-friendliness: Access Keys, Caret Navigation, Spatial Navigation
ELinks achieves 59% performance for user-friendliness. However, the current preferences ignore user-friendliness in computing the rankings.